Some of the most frequent causes for concern by leasehold occupiers of flats or houses are the costs of services and the standards of management and maintenance provided by the landlord. It is not unreasonable for leasehold tenants to want to know more about how their charges are made up and about the landlord's arrangements for managing and repairing their properties.
Information, other than that required by legislation, is often difficult to obtain just for a general assessment of management arrangements and highly problematical where tenants wish to actively challenge those arrangements.
A tenant with a leaking roof will find it difficult to dispute his landlord's costs or methods of repair, without a detailed inspection and a knowledge of building practice; similarly it is practically impossible to properly assess and evaluate contractual and financial arrangements. Although recent legislation has provided rights to question the reasonableness of service charges, this may not be possible in the absence of full information.
In our leaflet Application to the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal we emphasise the need for expert, objective, evidence in support of such applications. In many cases the matters in dispute will be beyond the abilities of the tenants to contest without both detailed information, presently only known to the landlord, and detailed advice relating to the structure and physical state of repair of the property. Whilst tenants have rights of access to certain information under Landlord and Tenant Acts this will not be sufficient, in many cases, to contest major issues of dispute on service charges.
However, leasehold tenants (and other renting tenants who pay variable service charges) have a legal right to appoint a surveyor to examine the management practices of their landlord. Where tenants are unhappy about any aspect of the management of their property, its state of repair or general maintenance, levels of service charges or the landlord's provision of accounting information, the law provides two rights:
The rights do not provide any specific remedy to problems in themselves but are to provide tenants with information:
The appointed surveyor or auditor has legal powers of access to the building/estate and the landlord's accounts and other documents;
Both the rights provide direct means for tenants paying variable service charges to fully investigate how the landlord is spending their service charge contributions, how he is maintaining the property or estate and the efficiency of his management arrangements. In the provision of the rights the legislation is redressing the difficulty tenants can have in obtaining necessary information from their landlord, particularly so when they require the information for the purpose of evaluating the landlord's management or challenging charges.
The 1985 and 1987 Landlord and Tenant Acts provided rights to information, including summaries of costs and rights for tenants to inspect (but not receive) certain documents (these rights are set out in full in Appendix 1). The 1993 Leasehold Reform Act set out to provide greater rights for tenants not only to obtain information but to evaluate the management arrangements against an approved code of practice. In the arrangements for codes of management conduct to be formally approved by the Secretary of State, the Act provided for the first time published accessible criteria against which management could be measured.
The 1996 Housing Act introduced, by amendment to the 1985 and 1987 Acts, new procedures for tenants to challenge the reasonableness of their service charges and to have the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal appoint a manager. The legislation recognised the difficulties of tenants in obtaining detailed information in support of their actions and provided a right to appoint a surveyor, able to require landlords to provide access to buildings, accounts and other documents, enforceable by court order.
Both rights provide legal rights of reasonable access for the appointed surveyor to otherwise confidential information. The exercise of these rights is dependent upon tenants meeting certain qualification conditions and providing proper notice to the landlord. Whilst tenants paying service charges should be fully entitled to know how their money is being spent, they should also accept that these rights provide enforceable access to what the landlord will, not unreasonably, regard as confidential business arrangements and they should not be used lightly. In all cases tenants are recommended to negotiate matters with the landlord, including use of any existing grievance procedures, prior to formal appointment of auditor or surveyor.
The purposeThe purpose of the audit is set out in S78 of the 1993 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act as:
"an audit carried out for the purposes of ascertaining:
a) the extent to which the obligations of the landlord which
i) are owed to the qualifying tenants, and
ii) involve the discharge of management functions in relation to the relevant premises or any appurtenant property,
are being discharged in an efficient and effective manner; and
b) the extent to which sums payable by those tenants by way of service charges are being applied in an efficient and effective manner"
The purpose of this right is clearly to carry out an objective assessment of the landlord's management functions and procedures and to evaluate those; it is not simply to provide rights of access to premises and information as a "fishing expedition".
The Appointment of a SurveyorThe rationale for the appointment of a surveyor is set out in S84 of the 1996 Housing Act and is much less specific:
to appoint a surveyor "..to advise on any matters relating to, or which may give rise to, service charges payable to a landlord..."
This is clearly a wider remit for both the tenants and the appointed surveyor and, whilst the information gathered may be similar to that required for the Management Audit, its use is not limited other than that it should provide the basis of advice on service charges.
Codes of PracticeThe auditor or the appointed surveyor may refer to approved codes of management practice in evaluating the landlord's management or service charge arrangements. These codes are approved by the Secretary of State for Housing and are not legally enforceable but may be used to evaluate a landlord's management for purposes of a management audit, or to support tenants' applications in any court or tribunal proceedings.
The Secretary of State has, to date, approved two codes of practice, one produced by the Association of Retirement Housing Managers relating to retirement housing and one by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors relevant to all tenants paying variable service charges. Either code may be used. They are obtainable direct from the ARHM and the RICS.
What can be achieved ?Tenants should be clear in their objectives before deciding on the appropriate course of action. A management audit is a one-task appointment, to carry out an investigation and then report back to the tenants in the form of an audit. The appointment of a surveyor is on-going, to assist and advise the tenants as appropriate to their requirements; it continues until formally ceased by the association. In practice both approaches are likely to cover the same ground and to produce similar results, although the appointment of a surveyor provides greater flexibility.
Examples of matters the Auditor could examine include:
With this the auditor can provide the tenants with an informed professional judgement:
The Surveyor can, if so instructed, do all of the above. In addition he can carry out other ad-hoc tasks according to the tenants' association's specific requirements. These can simply be to carry out annual or quarterly inspections to advise on repairs and management matters or to advise the association on all service charge demands; the appointment may be little more than a retainer to ensure the availability of expert advice when required. Alternatively, the surveyor may be appointed to provide evidence for tenants, who are members of the association, to challenge their service charges before a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal or, in serious cases, to apply for the appointment of a manager.
ConsiderationsCare must be taken by tenants in selecting the appropriate procedure for their building and qualification will count for as much as the objectives to be achieved. There are different qualification criteria for two rights and these are set out below, together with procedures for appointment, notice to the landlord and relative rights of access.
It must be appreciated that the procedures provide considerable rights for tenants to obtain what may be sensitive information and that these rights arise solely from formal appointment of the auditor or surveyor and proper notice to the landlord in accordance with statutory requirements. The form of the notices varies in accordance with the nature of the appointment. The appointment of a surveyor is the start of an open-ended arrangement, during the course of which the surveyor may have occasion to require information or rights of access from the landlord; the management audit is a specific investigation with a prospective completion date and commences with direct requests to the landlord for information. Therefore the notice to the landlord regarding the appointment of a surveyor is simply the provision of information; that for the appointment of an auditor is the commencement of a process.
In either case the auditor's or surveyor's notices may be served on the landlord's managing agent but must be copied to the landlord's official address. Again, both procedures allow for access to documents etc held by a superior landlord. Similarly, where a landlord disposes of his interest after service of the notices, his successor in title will be bound by them and must comply within one month of the date of disposal.
CostsThe landlord, or his managing agent, cannot charge for the provision of documents or the facilities provided for their inspection but they may make a reasonable charge for their copying.
However, the landlord can, quite legitimately, add any costs to him arising from the audit or activities of the appointed surveyor to the tenants' service charges. The only protection here for tenants is that those costs would be subject to the challenge of reasonableness, as other service charge costs.
Management AuditTo qualify for the right a tenant must have a long lease (an original lease of more
than 21 years) which includes an obligation to pay service charges. The dwelling can be a
flat or a house but the lease must not be a business lease:
Management Audits were introduced as part of legislation for leasehold reform and are
applicable only to premises occupied by "qualifying tenants", that is long
leaseholders. It is clear from the legislation that, whilst a management audit may be
commissioned in respect of a building occupied by both long leaseholders and other tenants
paying a variable service charge (so long as the long leaseholders have a two-thirds
majority), the audit is only applicable to the flats of the qualifying tenants. Whether
this would, in application, cause a problem is not so clear. However, a management audit
may be commenced by either or both leaseholders of a building in only two flats where it
is unlikely that a tenants' association exists. It is also available to individual
leaseholders of houses or properties which contain only one flat. The auditor must satisfy certain statutory requirements:
either i) a qualified Accountant; which means a member of: or ii) a qualified Surveyor, which means a fellow or associate of i) a tenant of the premises, or ii) an officer, partner, agent or employee of the landlord The auditor may appoint others to assist him in the audit (who also exercise the rights
of the auditor). An accountant may employ a surveyor for the purpose of the property
inspection, a surveyor may employ an accountant for examination of the accounts. There is
no specific advantage in the audit being carried out by either profession but tenants
should check the auditor's relevant experience in property management. for purposes of an audit, the auditor has a statutory right (S79 1993 Act) to require
the landlord:
These rights arise from the provision of a notice to the landlord, under S80 of the
1993 Act, stating
The notice must be signed by all the tenants. The landlord must comply with the notice within one month, or serve a
counter-notice setting out his objections, or proposing an alternative date for the
inspection. Where the landlord fails to comply or, provides objections, the auditor may
apply to the court for an order. The application to the court must be made no sooner than two months nor later than four
months after the service of the S80 notice. This is not restricted to leaseholders but is a right only available to a recognised
tenants' association, that is a tenants' association formally recognised by the
landlord or by the local Rent Assessment Committee. The right applies to tenants and leaseholders but is not available to individuals, only
to the recognised tenants association. Where there is already a recognised tenants'
association in existence the appointment can be simply achieved and avoids the
complications and, sometimes, difficulties of achieving the two-thirds majority required
for the management audit. However, where there is no recognised association this will have
to be put in place first, before any further progress can be made. (See Appendix 2) In cases where tenants wish to
appoint a surveyor in furtherance of a challenge of service charges the additional delay
in setting up and obtaining recognition of an association may cause difficulties. The surveyor must be qualified as in the case of a management audit. There are no
restrictions on the surveyors being a tenant of the premises. The surveyor may also
appoint an assistant. The assistant can be another expert to investigate and advise on particular issues. For
example, the surveyor can call in an accountant to check the soundness of the landlord's
accounting systems and financial management and to look at the safeguarding of the
tenants' sinking funds. Similarly, he can appoint consulting engineers to check on
technical and construction matters. The rights available to the appointed surveyor are wider and more flexible than for the
management audit . He may require the landlord:
The formal appointment of the surveyor takes effect from the service of a notice on the
landlord by the association stating:
The notice is, at this stage, simply a notification to the landlord of the appointment
and does not include any requirements for information from the landlord. The appointment will remain in effect until the service of a further notice cancelling
the arrangement. There is no prescribed form for the notice to the landlord, who must comply within one
week "or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter"; or give the
surveyor a notice stating that he objects to doing so for reasons specified in the notice.
Where the landlord fails to comply after one month and has not served a notice of
objection the surveyor may immediately apply to the court for an order ( within a period
of four months from service of his original notice). Tenants should recognise that in pursuit of information the appointed surveyor has far
more rights on their behalf than the individual tenants or the tenants' association. The full powers available to appointed surveyors is set out in Schedule 4 to the 1996
Housing Act. The area in which a surveyor may be particularly valuable is in assembling and
presenting the evidence for a challenge of service charges and, at the tribunal hearing,
countering the landlord's arguments. The surveyor's rights to demand information, to
obtain access for inspection and his own technical expertise can usefully inform arguments
about the costs of works of repair. For example, the surveyor may consider the following matters: was or is the work
necessary at all? how much of the necessary work arises from previous neglect? how
thorough was or is the specification and how much is it a reflection of what actually
needs doing? what arrangements has the landlord for price tendering? how are the works
supervised? what arrangements are there to deal with additional or unforeseen works - does
this provide an opportunity to increase previously agreed costs?, what arrangements has
the landlord for final inspection and payment? - and, perhaps, of most importance, were
the works done properly? All these issues can be addressed by a competent surveyor, working within and fully
utilising, the rights of the 1996 Act. Where a tenant, or group of tenants, or a recognised tenants' association wish
to proceed they should take time and care in the selection and instruction of the surveyor
or auditor. Not all surveying practices (and very few accountancy practices) specialise in
this area and tenants should not therefore presume the practice to have the necessary
expertise or a full knowledge of the relevant legislation. The rights available to the
tenants, through the auditor or surveyor, are entirely dependent upon full compliance with
statutory procedures and the appointment of a professional adviser not fully conversant
with those procedures can endanger the process. Tenants should ask, in interview with a prospective adviser, for him to explain the
process, particularly relating to notices and timescales, and set out a proposal of what
he intends to do, when, and to provide an outline timetable for feedback to the tenants.
Some practices may also provide a structured scale of fees for the work, if not, this
should be discussed. The fees should be agreed and a contract entered into before the
surveyor starts work. Some landlords may be reluctant to fully comply with an auditor's or surveyor's
wish to examine his accounts on grounds of confidentiality. There are no provisions in the
legislation providing a landlord or managing agent any right of embargo or partial
compliance arising from confidentiality of accounts, nor is there any provision for the
court to be able to order disclosure of information to be subject to the blanking out of
particularly confidential matters. The legislation gives no defence to the landlord in
this area. As the new legislation has not yet been tested in court it might be prudent to apply
the general principle of privity of information in these cases - that is, the
information, obtained under compulsion, is confidential to the auditor or surveyor, for
the purposes of his appointment, and is for use by the tenants in direct connection with
the audit or other specific purpose arising from the appointment of the surveyor. It would be wise, pending any contrary precedent, not to pass such information beyond
the auditor or surveyor and the relevant tenants - it should not be published in a
newspaper or given to other tenants of the same landlord. The two powers provide great opportunities for tenants to examine and evaluate the
arrangements for the management and repair of their premises and to know how the service
charges are made up. Neither right provides an end in itself but can provide information and evidence to
enforce better management, to challenge service charges, or insurance costs or to apply
for the replacement of the landlord with a new manager. The 1996 Act rights for the appointment of a surveyor are more flexible than the 1993
Act management audit arrangements and should be of great benefit to tenants. It must : The summary must be supplied within one month at the request or within six months at
the end of the accounting period, whichever is later. The secretary of a tenants' association should ask the landlord for a written notice of
recognition. Once the landlord does this he can only withdraw the recognition on six
months notice. Alternatively, or if the landlord refuses recognition, the association may apply to
their local Rent Assessment panel. Recognition will be at the discretion of the panel who
will normally expect the association to represent at least 60% of the tenants. The
recognition certificate is normally for a period of four years.
Notice to the landlord
Qualification
Notice to the landlord
Appendix 1
Management Audit
Appointment of Surveyor
1. Eligibility
2. Appointment
3. Right to Inspect Documents
4. Right to Inspect Premises
5. Where landlord fails to comply:
6. Duration of Appointment
Tenants' rights to information
Information about service charges
Information about insurance
Appendix 2
Recognised Tenants' Associations